Aruba vs Singapore: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Aruba
138.94 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Singapore
1,436 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Aruba rank
4th
Singapore rank
2nd

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Singapore
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 1,436 units per square kilometre against 138.94 units per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 1,297 units per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 10.3 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 2,837 units per square kilometre 40.66 units per square kilometre 2,797 units per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 3,222 units per square kilometre 626.39 units per square kilometre 2,595 units per square kilometre Aruba
1980s 1,996 units per square kilometre 1,154 units per square kilometre 841.91 units per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 1,597 units per square kilometre 2,067 units per square kilometre 469.51 units per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 1,643 units per square kilometre 2,506 units per square kilometre 863.51 units per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 436.09 units per square kilometre 3,422 units per square kilometre 2,986 units per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 115.88 units per square kilometre 1,302 units per square kilometre 1,186 units per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Aruba or Singapore?
Singapore, at 1,436 units per square kilometre against 138.94 units per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Aruba and Singapore?
1,297 units per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Singapore?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Aruba and Singapore rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Singapore: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/aruba/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/aruba/singapore/">Aruba vs Singapore: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.