Australia vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Australia
0.136 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0.1337 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Australia rank
143rd
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.30.4196119912022

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.136 units per square kilometre against 0.1337 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0023 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.141 units per square kilometre 0.136 units per square kilometre 0.005 units per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.1923 units per square kilometre 0.3366 units per square kilometre 0.1443 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.2006 units per square kilometre 0.3467 units per square kilometre 0.1461 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.205 units per square kilometre 0.3427 units per square kilometre 0.1377 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.1837 units per square kilometre 0.1695 units per square kilometre 0.0141 units per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.1573 units per square kilometre 0.1716 units per square kilometre 0.0143 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.1329 units per square kilometre 0.1215 units per square kilometre 0.0115 units per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Australia or Zimbabwe?
Australia, at 0.136 units per square kilometre against 0.1337 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Australia and Zimbabwe?
0.0023 units per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Australia and Zimbabwe rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 143rd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/australia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/australia/zimbabwe/">Australia vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.