Austria vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Austria
0.14 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0.1337 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Austria rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Austria
  • Zimbabwe
012345196119912022

How they compare

Austria currently reports 0.14 units per square kilometre against 0.1337 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0063 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 207 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 3.58 units per square kilometre 0.136 units per square kilometre 3.44 units per square kilometre Austria
1970s 4.09 units per square kilometre 0.3366 units per square kilometre 3.75 units per square kilometre Austria
1980s 2.43 units per square kilometre 0.3467 units per square kilometre 2.08 units per square kilometre Austria
1990s 0.6118 units per square kilometre 0.3427 units per square kilometre 0.269 units per square kilometre Austria
2000s 0.3273 units per square kilometre 0.1695 units per square kilometre 0.1577 units per square kilometre Austria
2010s 0.176 units per square kilometre 0.1716 units per square kilometre 0.0044 units per square kilometre Austria
2020s 0.1358 units per square kilometre 0.1215 units per square kilometre 0.0143 units per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Austria or Zimbabwe?
Austria, at 0.14 units per square kilometre against 0.1337 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Austria and Zimbabwe?
0.0063 units per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Austria and Zimbabwe rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Austria ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/austria/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/austria/zimbabwe/">Austria vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.