Bahamas vs Estonia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.3654 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Estonia
0.3933 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Bahamas rank
103rd
Estonia rank
100th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Estonia
012345196119912022

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.3933 units per square kilometre against 0.3654 units per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0279 units per square kilometre.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Bahamas ranks 103rd and Estonia ranks 100th of 207 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.4 units per square kilometre 3.2 units per square kilometre 1.8 units per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.6308 units per square kilometre 2.1 units per square kilometre 1.47 units per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 0.5352 units per square kilometre 1.34 units per square kilometre 0.8092 units per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 0.3514 units per square kilometre 0.3704 units per square kilometre 0.019 units per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Bahamas or Estonia?
Estonia, at 0.3933 units per square kilometre against 0.3654 units per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Bahamas and Estonia?
0.0279 units per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Estonia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Bahamas and Estonia rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 103rd and Estonia ranks 100th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Estonia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/estonia/">Bahamas vs Estonia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.