Barbados vs Belgium: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Barbados
5.55 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Belgium
5.03 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Barbados rank
22nd
Belgium rank
23rd

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Belgium
05101520196119912022

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 5.55 units per square kilometre against 5.03 units per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.52 units per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 22nd and Belgium ranks 23rd of 207 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Belgium in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Belgium Difference Ahead
2000s 8.27 units per square kilometre 18.06 units per square kilometre 9.79 units per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 7.74 units per square kilometre 12.07 units per square kilometre 4.33 units per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 5.36 units per square kilometre 4.35 units per square kilometre 1.01 units per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Barbados or Belgium?
Barbados, at 5.55 units per square kilometre against 5.03 units per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Barbados and Belgium?
0.52 units per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Belgium?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Barbados and Belgium rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 22nd and Belgium ranks 23rd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Belgium: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/barbados/belgium/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/barbados/belgium/">Barbados vs Belgium: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.