Barbados vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Barbados
5.55 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.55 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Barbados rank
22nd
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
25th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
05101520196119912022

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 5.55 units per square kilometre against 4.55 units per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1 units per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.2 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 22nd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 25th of 207 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
1990s 16.84 units per square kilometre 2.51 units per square kilometre 14.33 units per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 8.27 units per square kilometre 3.66 units per square kilometre 4.61 units per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 7.74 units per square kilometre 4.52 units per square kilometre 3.22 units per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 5.36 units per square kilometre 4.63 units per square kilometre 0.7342 units per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Barbados or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Barbados, at 5.55 units per square kilometre against 4.55 units per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Barbados and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
1 units per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Barbados and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 22nd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 25th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/barbados/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/barbados/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Barbados vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.