Barbados vs Netherlands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Barbados
5.55 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Netherlands
6.33 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Barbados rank
22nd
Netherlands rank
21st

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Netherlands
0102030196119912022

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 6.33 units per square kilometre against 5.55 units per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 0.78 units per square kilometre.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 22nd and Netherlands ranks 21st of 207 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.785 units per square kilometre 27.41 units per square kilometre 26.62 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1970s 11.82 units per square kilometre 29.1 units per square kilometre 17.28 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 8.9 units per square kilometre 22.84 units per square kilometre 13.93 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1990s 17.01 units per square kilometre 21.83 units per square kilometre 4.82 units per square kilometre Netherlands
2000s 8.27 units per square kilometre 25.09 units per square kilometre 16.82 units per square kilometre Netherlands
2010s 7.74 units per square kilometre 17.92 units per square kilometre 10.18 units per square kilometre Netherlands
2020s 5.36 units per square kilometre 5.74 units per square kilometre 0.3731 units per square kilometre Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Barbados or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 6.33 units per square kilometre against 5.55 units per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Barbados and Netherlands?
0.78 units per square kilometre, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Netherlands?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Barbados and Netherlands rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 22nd and Netherlands ranks 21st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Netherlands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/barbados/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/barbados/netherlands/">Barbados vs Netherlands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.