Belgium vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Belgium
5.03 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Trinidad and Tobago
4.16 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Belgium rank
23rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
26th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Belgium
  • Trinidad and Tobago
01020304050196119912022

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 5.03 units per square kilometre against 4.16 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.87 units per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 23rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 26th of 207 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2000s 18.06 units per square kilometre 10.67 units per square kilometre 7.39 units per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 12.07 units per square kilometre 7.9 units per square kilometre 4.17 units per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 4.35 units per square kilometre 2.87 units per square kilometre 1.49 units per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Belgium or Trinidad and Tobago?
Belgium, at 5.03 units per square kilometre against 4.16 units per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Belgium and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.87 units per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Trinidad and Tobago?
23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
How do Belgium and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Belgium ranks 23rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 26th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/belgium/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/belgium/trinidad-and-tobago/">Belgium vs Trinidad and Tobago: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.