Botswana vs East Timor: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0696 units per square kilometre
in 2022
East Timor
0.0698 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Botswana rank
169th
East Timor rank
168th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • East Timor
00.050.10.15196119912022

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 0.0698 units per square kilometre against 0.0696 units per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0002 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Timor ahead.

Botswana ranks 169th and East Timor ranks 168th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and East Timor in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0023 units per square kilometre 0.0022 units per square kilometre East Timor
1970s 0.0101 units per square kilometre 0.0026 units per square kilometre 0.0076 units per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0.0202 units per square kilometre 0.0031 units per square kilometre 0.0171 units per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0.0747 units per square kilometre 0.0065 units per square kilometre 0.0682 units per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.1215 units per square kilometre 0.0639 units per square kilometre 0.0576 units per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0.0979 units per square kilometre 0.0704 units per square kilometre 0.0276 units per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.0611 units per square kilometre 0.0684 units per square kilometre 0.0072 units per square kilometre East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Botswana or East Timor?
East Timor, at 0.0698 units per square kilometre against 0.0696 units per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Botswana and East Timor?
0.0002 units per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and East Timor?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Botswana and East Timor rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 169th and East Timor ranks 168th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs East Timor: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/botswana/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/botswana/timor-leste/">Botswana vs East Timor: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.