Botswana vs Timor-Leste: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Botswana
0.0696 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Timor-Leste
0.0698 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Botswana rank
169th
Timor-Leste rank
168th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Timor-Leste
00.050.10.15196119912022

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 0.0698 units per square kilometre against 0.0696 units per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 0.0002 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Timor-Leste ahead.

Botswana ranks 169th and Timor-Leste ranks 168th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 5 and Timor-Leste in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0002 units per square kilometre 0.0023 units per square kilometre 0.0022 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste
1970s 0.0101 units per square kilometre 0.0026 units per square kilometre 0.0076 units per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 0.0202 units per square kilometre 0.0031 units per square kilometre 0.0171 units per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 0.0747 units per square kilometre 0.0065 units per square kilometre 0.0682 units per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 0.1215 units per square kilometre 0.0639 units per square kilometre 0.0576 units per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 0.0979 units per square kilometre 0.0704 units per square kilometre 0.0276 units per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.0611 units per square kilometre 0.0684 units per square kilometre 0.0072 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Botswana or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 0.0698 units per square kilometre against 0.0696 units per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Botswana and Timor-Leste?
0.0002 units per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Timor-Leste?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Botswana and Timor-Leste rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 169th and Timor-Leste ranks 168th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Timor-Leste: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/botswana/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/botswana/timor-leste/">Botswana vs Timor-Leste: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.