Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Brazil
0.1356 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0.1337 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Brazil rank
144th
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.30.4196119912022

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 0.1356 units per square kilometre against 0.1337 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0019 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0453 units per square kilometre 0.136 units per square kilometre 0.0907 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.1147 units per square kilometre 0.3366 units per square kilometre 0.2219 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.149 units per square kilometre 0.3467 units per square kilometre 0.1977 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.1895 units per square kilometre 0.3427 units per square kilometre 0.1533 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.1932 units per square kilometre 0.1695 units per square kilometre 0.0236 units per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 0.181 units per square kilometre 0.1716 units per square kilometre 0.0094 units per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.1413 units per square kilometre 0.1215 units per square kilometre 0.0198 units per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Brazil or Zimbabwe?
Brazil, at 0.1356 units per square kilometre against 0.1337 units per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Brazil and Zimbabwe?
0.0019 units per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Brazil and Zimbabwe rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/brazil/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/brazil/zimbabwe/">Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.