Burkina Faso vs Timor-Leste: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
0.0665 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Timor-Leste
0.0698 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Burkina Faso rank
171st
Timor-Leste rank
168th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Timor-Leste
00.020.040.060.08196119912022

How they compare

Timor-Leste currently reports 0.0698 units per square kilometre against 0.0665 units per square kilometre in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0033 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 171st and Timor-Leste ranks 168th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 4 and Timor-Leste in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0061 units per square kilometre 0.0023 units per square kilometre 0.0038 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1970s 0.01 units per square kilometre 0.0026 units per square kilometre 0.0075 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1980s 0.0164 units per square kilometre 0.0031 units per square kilometre 0.0133 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
1990s 0.0191 units per square kilometre 0.0065 units per square kilometre 0.0127 units per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2000s 0.0339 units per square kilometre 0.0639 units per square kilometre 0.03 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2010s 0.0452 units per square kilometre 0.0704 units per square kilometre 0.0252 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste
2020s 0.0599 units per square kilometre 0.0684 units per square kilometre 0.0085 units per square kilometre Timor-Leste

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Timor-Leste?
Timor-Leste, at 0.0698 units per square kilometre against 0.0665 units per square kilometre in Burkina Faso as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Timor-Leste?
0.0033 units per square kilometre, with Timor-Leste ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Timor-Leste?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Burkina Faso and Timor-Leste rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 171st and Timor-Leste ranks 168th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Timor-Leste: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/timor-leste/">Burkina Faso vs Timor-Leste: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.