Cape Verde vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Cape Verde
0.9339 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe
0.8766 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Cape Verde rank
70th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
73rd

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0123196119912022

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0.9339 units per square kilometre against 0.8766 units per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.0573 units per square kilometre.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 70th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 73rd of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0449 units per square kilometre 0.0877 units per square kilometre 0.0428 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 1.48 units per square kilometre 0.1547 units per square kilometre 1.33 units per square kilometre Cape Verde
1980s 0.1785 units per square kilometre 0.2759 units per square kilometre 0.0975 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.1518 units per square kilometre 0.2415 units per square kilometre 0.0897 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.3543 units per square kilometre 0.4355 units per square kilometre 0.0812 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.6868 units per square kilometre 0.588 units per square kilometre 0.0987 units per square kilometre Cape Verde
2020s 0.8118 units per square kilometre 0.7698 units per square kilometre 0.042 units per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Cape Verde or Sao Tome and Principe?
Cape Verde, at 0.9339 units per square kilometre against 0.8766 units per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0573 units per square kilometre, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Cape Verde ranks 70th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 73rd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/sao-tome-and-principe/">Cape Verde vs Sao Tome and Principe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.