Canada vs East Timor: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Canada
0.0716 units per square kilometre
in 2022
East Timor
0.0698 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Canada rank
165th
East Timor rank
168th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Canada
  • East Timor
00.20.40.6196119912022

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.0716 units per square kilometre against 0.0698 units per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0.0018 units per square kilometre.

Across all 62 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 165th and East Timor ranks 168th of 207 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada East Timor Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4825 units per square kilometre 0.0023 units per square kilometre 0.4802 units per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.5868 units per square kilometre 0.0026 units per square kilometre 0.5842 units per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.4207 units per square kilometre 0.0031 units per square kilometre 0.4176 units per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.2985 units per square kilometre 0.0065 units per square kilometre 0.2921 units per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.233 units per square kilometre 0.0639 units per square kilometre 0.1691 units per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.1242 units per square kilometre 0.0704 units per square kilometre 0.0538 units per square kilometre Canada
2020s 0.074 units per square kilometre 0.0684 units per square kilometre 0.0057 units per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Canada or East Timor?
Canada, at 0.0716 units per square kilometre against 0.0698 units per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Canada and East Timor?
0.0018 units per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and East Timor?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Canada and East Timor rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Canada ranks 165th and East Timor ranks 168th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs East Timor: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/canada/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/canada/timor-leste/">Canada vs East Timor: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.