Congo vs Mauritania: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Congo
0.026 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Mauritania
0.0156 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Congo rank
191st
Mauritania rank
194th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Mauritania
00.010.020.03196119912022

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.026 units per square kilometre against 0.0156 units per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0104 units per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.7 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 191st and Mauritania ranks 194th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0103 units per square kilometre 0.0013 units per square kilometre 0.009 units per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0109 units per square kilometre 0.004 units per square kilometre 0.0069 units per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.0098 units per square kilometre 0.0079 units per square kilometre 0.0019 units per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.0063 units per square kilometre 0.0126 units per square kilometre 0.0063 units per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 0.0108 units per square kilometre 0.008 units per square kilometre 0.0028 units per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0248 units per square kilometre 0.0101 units per square kilometre 0.0147 units per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0243 units per square kilometre 0.0137 units per square kilometre 0.0107 units per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Congo or Mauritania?
Congo, at 0.026 units per square kilometre against 0.0156 units per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Congo and Mauritania?
0.0104 units per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritania?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Congo and Mauritania rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 191st and Mauritania ranks 194th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mauritania: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritania/">Congo vs Mauritania: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.