Congo vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Congo
0.026 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.0262 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Congo rank
191st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
190th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.010.020.030.040.05196119912022

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.0262 units per square kilometre against 0.026 units per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0002 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 191st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 190th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0103 units per square kilometre 0.0061 units per square kilometre 0.0042 units per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0109 units per square kilometre 0.012 units per square kilometre 0.0011 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 0.0098 units per square kilometre 0.0141 units per square kilometre 0.0043 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 0.0063 units per square kilometre 0.0197 units per square kilometre 0.0133 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0.0108 units per square kilometre 0.0328 units per square kilometre 0.022 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.0248 units per square kilometre 0.0336 units per square kilometre 0.0088 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.0243 units per square kilometre 0.0243 units per square kilometre 0 units per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Congo or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.0262 units per square kilometre against 0.026 units per square kilometre in Congo as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Congo and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0002 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tanzania, United Republic of?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Congo and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 191st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 190th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/tanzania/">Congo vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.