Cuba vs United States Virgin Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Cuba
2.59 units per square kilometre
in 2022
United States Virgin Islands
2.76 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Cuba rank
39th
United States Virgin Islands rank
37th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Cuba
  • United States Virgin Islands
05101520196119912022

How they compare

United States Virgin Islands currently reports 2.76 units per square kilometre against 2.59 units per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.17 units per square kilometre.

That makes United States Virgin Islands's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 39th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 37th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and United States Virgin Islands in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba United States Virgin Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 1.86 units per square kilometre 1.12 units per square kilometre 0.7462 units per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 2.81 units per square kilometre 3.44 units per square kilometre 0.6295 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
1980s 3.54 units per square kilometre 4.17 units per square kilometre 0.6321 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
1990s 3.15 units per square kilometre 17.46 units per square kilometre 14.31 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2000s 3.43 units per square kilometre 8.88 units per square kilometre 5.45 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2010s 3.46 units per square kilometre 4.74 units per square kilometre 1.28 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands
2020s 2.62 units per square kilometre 2.71 units per square kilometre 0.0882 units per square kilometre United States Virgin Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Cuba or United States Virgin Islands?
United States Virgin Islands, at 2.76 units per square kilometre against 2.59 units per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Cuba and United States Virgin Islands?
0.17 units per square kilometre, with United States Virgin Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and United States Virgin Islands?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Cuba and United States Virgin Islands rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Cuba ranks 39th and United States Virgin Islands ranks 37th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs United States Virgin Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/cuba/virgin-islands-u-s/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/cuba/virgin-islands-u-s/">Cuba vs United States Virgin Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.