Curaçao vs Hong Kong, China: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Curaçao
124.58 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Hong Kong, China
164.28 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Curaçao rank
5th
Hong Kong, China rank
3rd

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Curaçao
  • Hong Kong, China
0200400600196119912022

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 164.28 units per square kilometre against 124.58 units per square kilometre in Curaçao, a difference of 39.7 units per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.3 times Curaçao's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Curaçao ahead.

Curaçao ranks 5th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 207 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curaçao Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2010s 404.41 units per square kilometre 458.68 units per square kilometre 54.27 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 107.44 units per square kilometre 153.3 units per square kilometre 45.86 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Curaçao or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 164.28 units per square kilometre against 124.58 units per square kilometre in Curaçao as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Curaçao and Hong Kong, China?
39.7 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Hong Kong, China?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
How do Curaçao and Hong Kong, China rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Curaçao ranks 5th and Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curaçao vs Hong Kong, China: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/curacao/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/curacao/hong-kong-sar-china/">Curaçao vs Hong Kong, China: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.