Curacao vs Malta: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Curacao
124.58 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Malta
104.64 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Curacao rank
5th
Malta rank
8th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Curacao
  • Malta
0200400600196119912022

How they compare

Curacao currently reports 124.58 units per square kilometre against 104.64 units per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 19.94 units per square kilometre.

That makes Curacao's figure about 1.2 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Curacao ahead.

Curacao ranks 5th and Malta ranks 8th of 207 countries.

Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Malta Difference Ahead
2010s 404.41 units per square kilometre 243.53 units per square kilometre 160.89 units per square kilometre Curacao
2020s 107.44 units per square kilometre 96.67 units per square kilometre 10.77 units per square kilometre Curacao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Curacao or Malta?
Curacao, at 124.58 units per square kilometre against 104.64 units per square kilometre in Malta as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Curacao and Malta?
19.94 units per square kilometre, with Curacao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Malta?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
How do Curacao and Malta rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Curacao ranks 5th and Malta ranks 8th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Malta: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/curacao/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/curacao/malta/">Curacao vs Malta: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.