Curacao vs Singapore: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Curacao
124.58 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Singapore
1,436 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Curacao rank
5th
Singapore rank
2nd

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Curacao
  • Singapore
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119912022

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 1,436 units per square kilometre against 124.58 units per square kilometre in Curacao, a difference of 1,311 units per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 11.5 times Curacao's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Curacao ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 207 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Singapore Difference Ahead
2010s 404.41 units per square kilometre 3,442 units per square kilometre 3,038 units per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 107.44 units per square kilometre 1,302 units per square kilometre 1,194 units per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Curacao or Singapore?
Singapore, at 1,436 units per square kilometre against 124.58 units per square kilometre in Curacao as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Curacao and Singapore?
1,311 units per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Singapore?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
How do Curacao and Singapore rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Curacao ranks 5th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Singapore: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/curacao/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/curacao/singapore/">Curacao vs Singapore: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.