Dominica vs United States of America: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Dominica
0.2145 units per square kilometre
in 2022
United States of America
0.2188 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Dominica rank
128th
United States of America rank
127th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Dominica
  • United States of America
0123196119912022

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 0.2188 units per square kilometre against 0.2145 units per square kilometre in Dominica, a difference of 0.0043 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States of America ahead.

Dominica ranks 128th and United States of America ranks 127th of 207 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 0.027 units per square kilometre 2.69 units per square kilometre 2.66 units per square kilometre United States of America
1970s 0.0476 units per square kilometre 3.13 units per square kilometre 3.08 units per square kilometre United States of America
1980s 0.0921 units per square kilometre 2.54 units per square kilometre 2.45 units per square kilometre United States of America
1990s 0.6782 units per square kilometre 2.2 units per square kilometre 1.53 units per square kilometre United States of America
2000s 0.4348 units per square kilometre 1.47 units per square kilometre 1.03 units per square kilometre United States of America
2010s 0.2303 units per square kilometre 0.5019 units per square kilometre 0.2716 units per square kilometre United States of America
2020s 0.2122 units per square kilometre 0.2137 units per square kilometre 0.0015 units per square kilometre United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Dominica or United States of America?
United States of America, at 0.2188 units per square kilometre against 0.2145 units per square kilometre in Dominica as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Dominica and United States of America?
0.0043 units per square kilometre, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and United States of America?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Dominica and United States of America rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Dominica ranks 128th and United States of America ranks 127th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominica vs United States of America: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/dominica/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/dominica/united-states/">Dominica vs United States of America: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.