Ecuador vs Jordan: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.5334 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Jordan
0.5004 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Ecuador rank
90th
Jordan rank
93rd

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Jordan
00.511.5196119912022

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.5334 units per square kilometre against 0.5004 units per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0.033 units per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Ecuador ranks 90th and Jordan ranks 93rd of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Jordan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0447 units per square kilometre 0.0681 units per square kilometre 0.0234 units per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 0.131 units per square kilometre 0.1329 units per square kilometre 0.0019 units per square kilometre Jordan
1980s 0.2989 units per square kilometre 0.6736 units per square kilometre 0.3748 units per square kilometre Jordan
1990s 0.445 units per square kilometre 1.12 units per square kilometre 0.6767 units per square kilometre Jordan
2000s 0.6007 units per square kilometre 1.23 units per square kilometre 0.6305 units per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 0.6975 units per square kilometre 1.09 units per square kilometre 0.3904 units per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 0.5068 units per square kilometre 0.4665 units per square kilometre 0.0403 units per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Ecuador or Jordan?
Ecuador, at 0.5334 units per square kilometre against 0.5004 units per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Ecuador and Jordan?
0.033 units per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Jordan?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Ecuador and Jordan rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 90th and Jordan ranks 93rd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Jordan: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/jordan/">Ecuador vs Jordan: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.