Estonia vs Kiribati: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Estonia
0.3933 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Kiribati
0.4147 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Estonia rank
100th
Kiribati rank
98th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Estonia
  • Kiribati
012345196119912022

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.4147 units per square kilometre against 0.3933 units per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0.0214 units per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Estonia ranks 100th and Kiribati ranks 98th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 3 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 3.2 units per square kilometre 0.2174 units per square kilometre 2.98 units per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 2.1 units per square kilometre 0.3849 units per square kilometre 1.72 units per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 1.34 units per square kilometre 0.4247 units per square kilometre 0.9198 units per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 0.3704 units per square kilometre 0.405 units per square kilometre 0.0346 units per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Estonia or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0.4147 units per square kilometre against 0.3933 units per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Estonia and Kiribati?
0.0214 units per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Kiribati?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Estonia and Kiribati rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Estonia ranks 100th and Kiribati ranks 98th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Kiribati: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/estonia/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/estonia/kiribati/">Estonia vs Kiribati: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.