Hungary vs Namibia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Hungary
0.1451 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Namibia
0.1411 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Hungary rank
140th
Namibia rank
141st

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Hungary
  • Namibia
051015196119912022

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.1451 units per square kilometre against 0.1411 units per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.004 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 141st of 207 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 14.98 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre 14.98 units per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 14.75 units per square kilometre 0.0412 units per square kilometre 14.71 units per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 13.77 units per square kilometre 0.1268 units per square kilometre 13.64 units per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 7.48 units per square kilometre 0.0765 units per square kilometre 7.41 units per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 1.82 units per square kilometre 0.1689 units per square kilometre 1.65 units per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.2935 units per square kilometre 0.245 units per square kilometre 0.0485 units per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 0.1608 units per square kilometre 0.1437 units per square kilometre 0.0171 units per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Hungary or Namibia?
Hungary, at 0.1451 units per square kilometre against 0.1411 units per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Hungary and Namibia?
0.004 units per square kilometre, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Namibia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Hungary and Namibia rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Hungary ranks 140th and Namibia ranks 141st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Namibia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/hungary/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/hungary/namibia/">Hungary vs Namibia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.