Iceland vs Sweden: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Iceland
0.1303 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Sweden
0.1303 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Iceland rank
147th
Sweden rank
148th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Iceland
  • Sweden
00.511.522.5196119912022

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.1303 units per square kilometre against 0.1303 units per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Iceland ranks 147th and Sweden ranks 148th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3962 units per square kilometre 1.53 units per square kilometre 1.13 units per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.3611 units per square kilometre 1.87 units per square kilometre 1.51 units per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.1535 units per square kilometre 0.7409 units per square kilometre 0.5874 units per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.1115 units per square kilometre 0.3221 units per square kilometre 0.2106 units per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.1182 units per square kilometre 0.3279 units per square kilometre 0.2097 units per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.1702 units per square kilometre 0.2464 units per square kilometre 0.0761 units per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.1274 units per square kilometre 0.121 units per square kilometre 0.0064 units per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Iceland or Sweden?
Iceland, at 0.1303 units per square kilometre against 0.1303 units per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Iceland and Sweden?
0 units per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sweden?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Iceland and Sweden rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Iceland ranks 147th and Sweden ranks 148th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Sweden: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/iceland/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/iceland/sweden/">Iceland vs Sweden: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.