Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Kazakhstan
0.3923 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Kiribati
0.4147 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Kazakhstan rank
101st
Kiribati rank
98th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Kiribati
00.250.50.7511.2196119912022

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.4147 units per square kilometre against 0.3923 units per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0224 units per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 101st and Kiribati ranks 98th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9098 units per square kilometre 0.2174 units per square kilometre 0.6924 units per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2000s 0.8387 units per square kilometre 0.3849 units per square kilometre 0.4539 units per square kilometre Kazakhstan
2010s 0.3905 units per square kilometre 0.4247 units per square kilometre 0.0343 units per square kilometre Kiribati
2020s 0.3806 units per square kilometre 0.405 units per square kilometre 0.0244 units per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Kazakhstan or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 0.4147 units per square kilometre against 0.3923 units per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Kazakhstan and Kiribati?
0.0224 units per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kiribati?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Kazakhstan and Kiribati rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Kazakhstan ranks 101st and Kiribati ranks 98th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/kiribati/">Kazakhstan vs Kiribati: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.