Kiribati vs Samoa: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Kiribati
0.4147 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Samoa
0.4405 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Kiribati rank
98th
Samoa rank
96th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Kiribati
  • Samoa
00.20.40.6196119912022

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0.4405 units per square kilometre against 0.4147 units per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 0.0258 units per square kilometre.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 98th and Samoa ranks 96th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1281 units per square kilometre 0.0594 units per square kilometre 0.0688 units per square kilometre Kiribati
1970s 0.2506 units per square kilometre 0.1402 units per square kilometre 0.1105 units per square kilometre Kiribati
1980s 0.1818 units per square kilometre 0.2434 units per square kilometre 0.0616 units per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 0.2064 units per square kilometre 0.2845 units per square kilometre 0.0781 units per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 0.3849 units per square kilometre 0.371 units per square kilometre 0.0139 units per square kilometre Kiribati
2010s 0.4247 units per square kilometre 0.4338 units per square kilometre 0.0091 units per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 0.405 units per square kilometre 0.4306 units per square kilometre 0.0256 units per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Kiribati or Samoa?
Samoa, at 0.4405 units per square kilometre against 0.4147 units per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Kiribati and Samoa?
0.0258 units per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Kiribati ranks 98th and Samoa ranks 96th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Samoa: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/kiribati/samoa/">Kiribati vs Samoa: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.