Kyrgyzstan vs New Zealand: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Kyrgyzstan
0.237 units per square kilometre
in 2022
New Zealand
0.2502 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
124th
New Zealand rank
122nd

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • New Zealand
0.10.20.30.40.5196119912022

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.2502 units per square kilometre against 0.237 units per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.0132 units per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 124th and New Zealand ranks 122nd of 207 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2737 units per square kilometre 0.2827 units per square kilometre 0.009 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 0.213 units per square kilometre 0.3402 units per square kilometre 0.1272 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 0.3113 units per square kilometre 0.3154 units per square kilometre 0.004 units per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 0.2471 units per square kilometre 0.2622 units per square kilometre 0.0151 units per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Kyrgyzstan or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.2502 units per square kilometre against 0.237 units per square kilometre in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Kyrgyzstan and New Zealand?
0.0132 units per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and New Zealand?
31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2022.
How do Kyrgyzstan and New Zealand rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 124th and New Zealand ranks 122nd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs New Zealand: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/kyrgyz-republic/new-zealand/">Kyrgyzstan vs New Zealand: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.