Namibia vs Uruguay: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Namibia
0.1411 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Uruguay
0.1591 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Namibia rank
141st
Uruguay rank
138th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Uruguay
00.10.20.30.4196119912022

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.1591 units per square kilometre against 0.1411 units per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.018 units per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uruguay ahead.

Namibia ranks 141st and Uruguay ranks 138th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 units per square kilometre 0.2058 units per square kilometre 0.2057 units per square kilometre Uruguay
1970s 0.0412 units per square kilometre 0.2766 units per square kilometre 0.2354 units per square kilometre Uruguay
1980s 0.1268 units per square kilometre 0.1998 units per square kilometre 0.073 units per square kilometre Uruguay
1990s 0.0765 units per square kilometre 0.2219 units per square kilometre 0.1454 units per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 0.1689 units per square kilometre 0.276 units per square kilometre 0.107 units per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 0.245 units per square kilometre 0.2363 units per square kilometre 0.0087 units per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.1437 units per square kilometre 0.1607 units per square kilometre 0.017 units per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Namibia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 0.1591 units per square kilometre against 0.1411 units per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Namibia and Uruguay?
0.018 units per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uruguay?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Namibia and Uruguay rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 141st and Uruguay ranks 138th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Uruguay: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/namibia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/namibia/uruguay/">Namibia vs Uruguay: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.