New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
New Zealand
0.2502 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.2527 units per square kilometre
in 2022
New Zealand rank
122nd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
121st
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time
- New Zealand
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.2527 units per square kilometre against 0.2502 units per square kilometre in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0025 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 122nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 121st of 207 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3132 units per square kilometre | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 0.3129 units per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 0.3907 units per square kilometre | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | 0.3903 units per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 0.3048 units per square kilometre | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | 0.3042 units per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 0.2813 units per square kilometre | 0.0494 units per square kilometre | 0.2319 units per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.3402 units per square kilometre | 0.2299 units per square kilometre | 0.1103 units per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.3154 units per square kilometre | 0.2679 units per square kilometre | 0.0474 units per square kilometre | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.2622 units per square kilometre | 0.2499 units per square kilometre | 0.0123 units per square kilometre | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, New Zealand or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.2527 units per square kilometre against 0.2502 units per square kilometre in New Zealand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0025 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
- How do New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
- New Zealand ranks 122nd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 121st of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.