Rwanda vs Tunisia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Rwanda
0.2618 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Tunisia
0.2765 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda rank
118th
Tunisia rank
115th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Tunisia
00.20.40.6196119912022

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 0.2765 units per square kilometre against 0.2618 units per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0147 units per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Rwanda ranks 118th and Tunisia ranks 115th of 207 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.046 units per square kilometre 0.1515 units per square kilometre 0.1055 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1970s 0.0666 units per square kilometre 0.2855 units per square kilometre 0.2189 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 0.1521 units per square kilometre 0.4673 units per square kilometre 0.3152 units per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 0.1267 units per square kilometre 0.5059 units per square kilometre 0.3792 units per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 0.1543 units per square kilometre 0.4694 units per square kilometre 0.3151 units per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 0.1959 units per square kilometre 0.3113 units per square kilometre 0.1155 units per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 0.2327 units per square kilometre 0.2398 units per square kilometre 0.0072 units per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Rwanda or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 0.2765 units per square kilometre against 0.2618 units per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Rwanda and Tunisia?
0.0147 units per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Tunisia?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Rwanda and Tunisia rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 118th and Tunisia ranks 115th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Tunisia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/tunisia/">Rwanda vs Tunisia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.