Rwanda vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Rwanda
0.2618 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.2527 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Rwanda rank
118th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
121st

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.10.20.30.4196119912022

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.2618 units per square kilometre against 0.2527 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0091 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 118th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 121st of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 4 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.046 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre 0.0457 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.0666 units per square kilometre 0.0004 units per square kilometre 0.0662 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.1521 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre 0.1516 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 0.1267 units per square kilometre 0.0494 units per square kilometre 0.0774 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 0.1543 units per square kilometre 0.2299 units per square kilometre 0.0756 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.1959 units per square kilometre 0.2679 units per square kilometre 0.0721 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.2327 units per square kilometre 0.2499 units per square kilometre 0.0172 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Rwanda or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Rwanda, at 0.2618 units per square kilometre against 0.2527 units per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Rwanda and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0091 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Turks and Caicos Islands?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Rwanda and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 118th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 121st of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Rwanda vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.