South Africa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

South Africa
2.33 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.05 units per square kilometre
in 2022
South Africa rank
43rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
46th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
02468196119912022

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 2.33 units per square kilometre against 2.05 units per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.28 units per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Saint Kitts and Nevis's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 43rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 46th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 5 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.7652 units per square kilometre 0.0914 units per square kilometre 0.6738 units per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 1.29 units per square kilometre 0.1416 units per square kilometre 1.15 units per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 1.66 units per square kilometre 0.3625 units per square kilometre 1.3 units per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 1.94 units per square kilometre 2.94 units per square kilometre 0.9966 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 2.41 units per square kilometre 3.26 units per square kilometre 0.8552 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 2.68 units per square kilometre 2.17 units per square kilometre 0.5061 units per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 2.39 units per square kilometre 2.03 units per square kilometre 0.3658 units per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, South Africa or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
South Africa, at 2.33 units per square kilometre against 2.05 units per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between South Africa and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.28 units per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do South Africa and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 43rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 46th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/st-kitts-and-nevis/">South Africa vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.