Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre

Sweden
0.1303 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0.1337 units per square kilometre
in 2022
Sweden rank
148th
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre over time

  • Sweden
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.522.5196119912022

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1337 units per square kilometre against 0.1303 units per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0034 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 207 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sweden Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 1.53 units per square kilometre 0.136 units per square kilometre 1.39 units per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 1.87 units per square kilometre 0.3366 units per square kilometre 1.53 units per square kilometre Sweden
1980s 0.7409 units per square kilometre 0.3467 units per square kilometre 0.3942 units per square kilometre Sweden
1990s 0.3221 units per square kilometre 0.3427 units per square kilometre 0.0207 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.3279 units per square kilometre 0.1695 units per square kilometre 0.1583 units per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.2464 units per square kilometre 0.1716 units per square kilometre 0.0748 units per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.121 units per square kilometre 0.1215 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre, Sweden or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.1337 units per square kilometre against 0.1303 units per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
0.0034 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre?
Sweden ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-square-kilometre/sweden/zimbabwe/">Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 11,657 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.