Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs New Zealand: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP

Congo, Democratic Republic of the
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
New Zealand
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
154th
New Zealand rank
157th

Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP over time

  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
  • New Zealand
00000196019912022

How they compare

Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in New Zealand, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 154th and New Zealand ranks 157th of 204 countries.

Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Democratic Republic of the New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1970s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1980s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Congo, Democratic Republic of the
1990s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP Congo, Democratic Republic of the

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or New Zealand?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in New Zealand as of 2022.
What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and New Zealand?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2022.
How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and New Zealand rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp?
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 154th and New Zealand ranks 157th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs New Zealand: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/sulphur-dioxide-and-coal-per-unit-of-gdp/congo-dem-rep/new-zealand/">Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs New Zealand: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 10,833 data points, 1960–2022
Last refreshed

Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.