Curaçao vs Serbia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP
Curaçao
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Serbia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Curaçao rank
1st
Serbia rank
4th
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP over time
- Curaçao
- Serbia
How they compare
Curaçao currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Curaçao's figure about 1.9 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Serbia ahead.
Curaçao ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 4th of 204 countries.
Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curaçao | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | Curaçao |
| 2010s | 0.0001 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Curaçao |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Curaçao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp, Curaçao or Serbia?
- Curaçao, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp between Curaçao and Serbia?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Curaçao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Serbia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Curaçao and Serbia rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp?
- Curaçao ranks 1st and Serbia ranks 4th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.