Hong Kong, China vs South Sudan: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP
Hong Kong, China
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
South Sudan
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Hong Kong, China rank
129th
South Sudan rank
131st
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP over time
- Hong Kong, China
- South Sudan
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in South Sudan, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 129th and South Sudan ranks 131st of 204 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp, Hong Kong, China or South Sudan?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in South Sudan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp between Hong Kong, China and South Sudan?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Hong Kong, China and South Sudan rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 129th and South Sudan ranks 131st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.