Japan vs Latvia: Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP
Japan
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Latvia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Japan rank
179th
Latvia rank
182nd
Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP over time
- Japan
- Latvia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Japan ranks 179th and Latvia ranks 182nd of 204 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp, Japan or Latvia?
- Japan, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp between Japan and Latvia?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Latvia?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
- How do Japan and Latvia rank globally for sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of gdp?
- Japan ranks 179th and Latvia ranks 182nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Sulphur dioxide and coal, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Sulphur dioxide and coal divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.