Aruba vs Hong Kong, China: Total natural resources rents
Aruba
0.0%
in 2021
Hong Kong, China
0.0%
in 2021
Aruba rank
185th
Hong Kong, China rank
187th
Total natural resources rents over time
- Aruba
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Aruba's figure about 2.1 times Hong Kong, China's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Aruba ranks 185th and Hong Kong, China ranks 187th of 214 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Hong Kong, China in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Aruba |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total natural resources rents, Aruba or Hong Kong, China?
- Aruba, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, China as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total natural resources rents between Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.0%, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2021.
- How do Aruba and Hong Kong, China rank globally for total natural resources rents?
- Aruba ranks 185th and Hong Kong, China ranks 187th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Total natural resources rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total natural resources rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents (hard and soft), mineral rents, and forest rents.