Cape Verde vs IBRD only: Total natural resources rents
Cape Verde
17.7%
in 2021
IBRD only
4.6%
in 2021
Cape Verde rank
30th
IBRD only rank
27th
Total natural resources rents over time
- Cape Verde
- IBRD only
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 17.7% against 4.6% in IBRD only, a difference of 13.1%.
That makes Cape Verde's figure about 3.8 times IBRD only's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Cape Verde has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 30th and IBRD only ranks 27th of 214 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 63.8% | 6.5% | 57.3% | Cape Verde |
| 1990s | 34.2% | 4.6% | 29.6% | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 25.7% | 7.1% | 18.6% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 18.7% | 5.1% | 13.5% | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 14.6% | 3.4% | 11.2% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total natural resources rents, Cape Verde or IBRD only?
- Cape Verde, at 17.7% against 4.6% in IBRD only as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total natural resources rents between Cape Verde and IBRD only?
- 13.1%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and IBRD only?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1987 to 2021.
- How do Cape Verde and IBRD only rank globally for total natural resources rents?
- Cape Verde ranks 30th and IBRD only ranks 27th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Total natural resources rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total natural resources rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents (hard and soft), mineral rents, and forest rents.