East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Sudan: Total natural resources rents

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2.1%
in 2021
South Sudan
13.1%
in 2015
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
40th
South Sudan rank
40th

Total natural resources rents over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • South Sudan
0204060197019952021

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 13.1% against 2.1% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 11.0%.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 6.2 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 8 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 40th and South Sudan ranks 40th of 47 groups.

South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) South Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 6.9% 46.7% 39.8% South Sudan
2010s 4.3% 26.2% 21.9% South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total natural resources rents, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 13.1% against 2.1% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2015.
What is the difference in total natural resources rents between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Sudan?
11.0%, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Sudan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and South Sudan rank globally for total natural resources rents?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 40th and South Sudan ranks 40th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Total natural resources rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Sudan: Total natural resources rents. Statizoid, drawing on The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/total-natural-resources-rents-percent-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/total-natural-resources-rents-percent-of-gdp/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/south-sudan/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs South Sudan: Total natural resources rents</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Total natural resources rents (% of GDP)
Unit
% of GDP
Source
The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
262 places, 11,682 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed

Total natural resources rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents (hard and soft), mineral rents, and forest rents.