Finland vs Jamaica: Total natural resources rents
Finland
0.4%
in 2021
Jamaica
0.5%
in 2021
Finland rank
138th
Jamaica rank
137th
Total natural resources rents over time
- Finland
- Jamaica
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0.5% against 0.4% in Finland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Jamaica ahead.
Finland ranks 138th and Jamaica ranks 137th of 214 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Jamaica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.3% | 8.5% | 7.2% | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 0.8% | 7.8% | 7.0% | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 0.5% | 4.2% | 3.8% | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 0.4% | 2.1% | 1.8% | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 0.5% | 1.5% | 1.1% | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.0% | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total natural resources rents, Finland or Jamaica?
- Jamaica, at 0.5% against 0.4% in Finland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total natural resources rents between Finland and Jamaica?
- 0.1%, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Jamaica?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Finland and Jamaica rank globally for total natural resources rents?
- Finland ranks 138th and Jamaica ranks 137th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Total natural resources rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total natural resources rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents (hard and soft), mineral rents, and forest rents.