Georgia vs New Zealand: Total natural resources rents
Georgia
1.4%
in 2021
New Zealand
1.5%
in 2021
Georgia rank
111th
New Zealand rank
108th
Total natural resources rents over time
- Georgia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1.5% against 1.4% in Georgia, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 111th and New Zealand ranks 108th of 214 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4% | 1.8% | 1.3% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.8% | 1.7% | 0.9% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 1.6% | 0.8% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1.2% | 1.4% | 0.2% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total natural resources rents, Georgia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 1.5% against 1.4% in Georgia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total natural resources rents between Georgia and New Zealand?
- 0.1%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and New Zealand?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2021.
- How do Georgia and New Zealand rank globally for total natural resources rents?
- Georgia ranks 111th and New Zealand ranks 108th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Total natural resources rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total natural resources rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents (hard and soft), mineral rents, and forest rents.