Malaysia vs Uganda: Total natural resources rents
Malaysia
6.9%
in 2021
Uganda
7.5%
in 2021
Malaysia rank
63rd
Uganda rank
60th
Total natural resources rents over time
- Malaysia
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 7.5% against 6.9% in Malaysia, a difference of 0.6%.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 60th of 214 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 27.5% | 11.7% | 15.8% | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 27.4% | 19.2% | 8.2% | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 15.9% | 18.4% | 2.6% | Uganda |
| 2000s | 12.0% | 14.4% | 2.4% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 7.7% | 10.0% | 2.3% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 5.7% | 7.5% | 1.8% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total natural resources rents, Malaysia or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 7.5% against 6.9% in Malaysia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total natural resources rents between Malaysia and Uganda?
- 0.6%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uganda?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do Malaysia and Uganda rank globally for total natural resources rents?
- Malaysia ranks 63rd and Uganda ranks 60th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Total natural resources rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total natural resources rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents (hard and soft), mineral rents, and forest rents.