OECD members vs Sudan: Total natural resources rents
OECD members
1.4%
in 2021
Sudan
12.8%
in 2021
OECD members rank
43rd
Sudan rank
41st
Total natural resources rents over time
- OECD members
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 12.8% against 1.4% in OECD members, a difference of 11.4%.
That makes Sudan's figure about 8.9 times OECD members's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 52 shared years of data; in 1970 it was OECD members ahead.
OECD members ranks 43rd and Sudan ranks 41st of 47 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, OECD members averaged higher in 3 and Sudan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | OECD members | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.4% | 0.0% | 1.4% | OECD members |
| 1980s | 1.6% | 0.0% | 1.6% | OECD members |
| 1990s | 0.6% | 0.3% | 0.3% | OECD members |
| 2000s | 1.0% | 10.9% | 9.9% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 0.8% | 7.1% | 6.2% | Sudan |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 11.0% | 10.1% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total natural resources rents, OECD members or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 12.8% against 1.4% in OECD members as of 2021.
- What is the difference in total natural resources rents between OECD members and Sudan?
- 11.4%, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Sudan?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2021.
- How do OECD members and Sudan rank globally for total natural resources rents?
- OECD members ranks 43rd and Sudan ranks 41st of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Total natural resources rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total natural resources rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents (hard and soft), mineral rents, and forest rents.