What is the difference in total natural resources rents between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?

0.3%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?

34 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2021.

Where does this data come from?

The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Total natural resources rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Total natural resources rents

Tanzania, United Republic of

6.7%

in 2021

Zimbabwe

6.4%

in 2021

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

65th

Zimbabwe rank

67th

Total natural resources rents over time

Tanzania, United Republic of
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 6.7% against 6.4% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.3%.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 65th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 214 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Tanzania, United Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Tanzania, United Republic of	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1980s	8.1%	4.9%	3.3%	Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s	9.9%	7.6%	2.3%	Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s	5.2%	8.9%	3.7%	Zimbabwe
2010s	5.4%	5.5%	0.1%	Zimbabwe
2020s	5.3%	5.6%	0.3%	Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher total natural resources rents, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?: Tanzania, United Republic of, at 6.7% against 6.4% in Zimbabwe as of 2021.
What is the difference in total natural resources rents between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?: 0.3%, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2021.
How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for total natural resources rents?: Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 65th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB), published as Total natural resources rents (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Total natural resources rents. Statizoid, drawing on The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/total-natural-resources-rents-percent-of-gdp/tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/total-natural-resources-rents-percent-of-gdp/tanzania/zimbabwe/">Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Total natural resources rents</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Total natural resources rents (% of GDP)
Unit: % of GDP
Source: The Changing Wealth of Nations, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 262 places, 11,682 data points, 1970–2021
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Total natural resources rents are the sum of oil rents, natural gas rents, coal rents (hard and soft), mineral rents, and forest rents.