Hong Kong, China vs Iceland: Wind energy generation vs. installed capacity

Hong Kong, China
0.909 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Iceland
10.42 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
73rd
Iceland rank
70th

Wind energy generation vs. installed capacity over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Iceland
051015199020072025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 10.42 terawatt-hours against 0.909 terawatt-hours in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 9.51 terawatt-hours.

That makes Iceland's figure about 11.5 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Iceland ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 73rd and Iceland ranks 70th of 79 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours
2000s 0.3465 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.3465 terawatt-hours Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.8446 terawatt-hours 5.3 terawatt-hours 4.46 terawatt-hours Iceland
2020s 0.9161 terawatt-hours 8.14 terawatt-hours 7.23 terawatt-hours Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wind energy generation vs. installed capacity, Hong Kong, China or Iceland?
Iceland, at 10.42 terawatt-hours against 0.909 terawatt-hours in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
What is the difference in wind energy generation vs. installed capacity between Hong Kong, China and Iceland?
9.51 terawatt-hours, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Iceland?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and Iceland rank globally for wind energy generation vs. installed capacity?
Hong Kong, China ranks 73rd and Iceland ranks 70th of 79 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Wind energy generation vs. installed capacity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Iceland: Wind energy generation vs. installed capacity. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/wind-energy-generation-vs-installed-capacity/hong-kong-sar-china/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/wind-energy-generation-vs-installed-capacity/hong-kong-sar-china/iceland/">Hong Kong, China vs Iceland: Wind energy generation vs. installed capacity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wind energy generation vs. installed capacity
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
81 places, 3,782 data points, 1965–2025
Last refreshed

Figures are based on gross generation and do not account for cross-border electricity supply.