Access to electricity, urban in Belarus
Belarus: Access to electricity, urban was 100.0% in 2024. ▬ Flat
Access to electricity, urban in Belarus, 1990–2024
Source: SDG 7.1.1 Electrification Dataset, World Bank (WB). Measured in % of urban population.
Analysis
In 2024, access to electricity, urban in Belarus stood at 100.0%. That is the highest value across all 35 years on record.
That represents a change of up 1.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, access to electricity, urban in Belarus peaked at 100.0% in 1990 and was at its lowest, 93.1%, in 2000.
That places Belarus 1st out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
Access to electricity, urban in Belarus, year by year
| Year | % of urban population | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 100.0% | — |
| 1991 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 93.1% | -6.9% |
| 2001 | 93.4% | +0.3% |
| 2002 | 93.7% | +0.3% |
| 2003 | 94.0% | +0.3% |
| 2004 | 94.3% | +0.3% |
| 2005 | 94.6% | +0.3% |
| 2006 | 95.0% | +0.4% |
| 2007 | 95.4% | +0.4% |
| 2008 | 95.8% | +0.4% |
| 2009 | 96.2% | +0.4% |
| 2010 | 96.6% | +0.4% |
| 2011 | 97.1% | +0.5% |
| 2012 | 97.5% | +0.4% |
| 2013 | 97.9% | +0.4% |
| 2014 | 98.3% | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 98.6% | +0.3% |
| 2016 | 99.0% | +0.4% |
| 2017 | 99.3% | +0.3% |
| 2018 | 99.7% | +0.4% |
| 2019 | 100.0% | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 100.0% | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 10 |
| 2000s | 94.5% | 93.1% | 96.2% | 10 |
| 2010s | 98.4% | 96.6% | 100.0% | 10 |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 1 Albania 100.0% compare
- 1 Algeria 100.0% compare
- 1 Andorra 100.0% compare
- 1 Antigua and Barbuda 100.0% compare
- 1 Argentina 100.0% compare
- 1 Armenia 100.0% compare
- 1 Aruba 100.0% compare
- 1 Australia 100.0% compare
- 1 Austria 100.0% compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 100.0% compare
- 1 Bahamas 100.0% compare
- 1 Bahrain 100.0% compare
- 1 Barbados 100.0% compare
- 1 Belgium 100.0% compare
- 1 Bermuda 100.0% compare
- 1 Bhutan 100.0% compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 100.0% compare
- 1 British Virgin Islands 100.0% compare
- 1 Brunei Darussalam 100.0% compare
- 1 Bulgaria 100.0% compare
- 1 Cambodia 100.0% compare
- 1 Canada 100.0% compare
- 1 Cayman Islands 100.0% compare
- 1 Chile 100.0% compare
- 1 China 100.0% compare
- 1 Croatia 100.0% compare
- 1 Cuba 100.0% compare
- 1 Curaçao 100.0% compare
- 1 Cyprus 100.0% compare
- 1 Czechia 100.0% compare
- 1 Denmark 100.0% compare
- 1 Dominica 100.0% compare
- 1 Ecuador 100.0% compare
- 1 Egypt 100.0% compare
- 1 Estonia 100.0% compare
- 1 Faroe Islands 100.0% compare
- 1 Finland 100.0% compare
- 1 France 100.0% compare
- 1 French Polynesia 100.0% compare
- 1 Georgia 100.0% compare
- 1 Germany 100.0% compare
- 1 Gibraltar 100.0% compare
- 1 Greece 100.0% compare
- 1 Greenland 100.0% compare
- 1 Guam 100.0% compare
- 1 Guyana 100.0% compare
- 1 Hong Kong, China 100.0% compare
- 1 Hungary 100.0% compare
- 1 Iceland 100.0% compare
- 1 India 100.0% compare
- 1 Indonesia 100.0% compare
- 1 Iran, Islamic Republic of 100.0% compare
- 1 Iraq 100.0% compare
- 1 Ireland 100.0% compare
- 1 Isle of Man 100.0% compare
- 1 Israel 100.0% compare
- 1 Italy 100.0% compare
- 1 Japan 100.0% compare
- 1 Jordan 100.0% compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 100.0% compare
- 1 Republic of Korea 100.0% compare
- 1 Kosovo 100.0% compare
- 1 Kuwait 100.0% compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 100.0% compare
- 1 Lao People's Democratic Republic 100.0% compare
- 1 Latvia 100.0% compare
- 1 Lebanon 100.0% compare
- 1 Libya 100.0% compare
- 1 Liechtenstein 100.0% compare
- 1 Lithuania 100.0% compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100.0% compare
- 1 Macau, China 100.0% compare
- 1 Malaysia 100.0% compare
- 1 Maldives 100.0% compare
- 1 Malta 100.0% compare
- 1 Mauritius 100.0% compare
- 1 Republic of Moldova 100.0% compare
- 1 Monaco 100.0% compare
- 1 Montenegro 100.0% compare
- 1 Morocco 100.0% compare
- 1 Naoero 100.0% compare
- 1 Netherlands 100.0% compare
- 1 New Caledonia 100.0% compare
- 1 New Zealand 100.0% compare
- 1 Nicaragua 100.0% compare
- 1 North Macedonia 100.0% compare
- 1 Northern Mariana Islands 100.0% compare
- 1 Norway 100.0% compare
- 1 Oman 100.0% compare
- 1 Palau 100.0% compare
- 1 Poland 100.0% compare
- 1 Portugal 100.0% compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 100.0% compare
- 1 Qatar 100.0% compare
- 1 Romania 100.0% compare
- 1 Russian Federation 100.0% compare
- 1 Samoa 100.0% compare
- 1 San Marino 100.0% compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 100.0% compare
- 1 Serbia 100.0% compare
- 1 Seychelles 100.0% compare
- 1 Singapore 100.0% compare
- 1 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 100.0% compare
- 1 Slovakia 100.0% compare
- 1 Slovenia 100.0% compare
- 1 Spain 100.0% compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 100.0% compare
- 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100.0% compare
- 1 Saint Lucia 100.0% compare
- 1 Saint Martin (French part) 100.0% compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100.0% compare
- 1 Suriname 100.0% compare
- 1 Sweden 100.0% compare
- 1 Switzerland 100.0% compare
- 1 Syrian Arab Republic 100.0% compare
- 1 Thailand 100.0% compare
- 1 Timor-Leste 100.0% compare
- 1 Tonga 100.0% compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 100.0% compare
- 1 Tunisia 100.0% compare
- 1 Türkiye 100.0% compare
- 1 Turkmenistan 100.0% compare
- 1 Turks and Caicos Islands 100.0% compare
- 1 Tuvalu 100.0% compare
- 1 Ukraine 100.0% compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100.0% compare
- 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100.0% compare
- 1 United States of America 100.0% compare
- 1 Uruguay 100.0% compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 100.0% compare
- 1 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 100.0% compare
- 1 Viet Nam 100.0% compare
- 1 United States Virgin Islands 100.0% compare
- 1 Palestine, State of 100.0% compare
- 1 Channel Islands 100.0% compare
- 1 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 100.0% compare
More energy & mining data for Belarus
- Fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per unit of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Primary energy use, annual growth rate -1.45 % change on previous year (2025)
- Coal consumption, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2025)
- Coal consumption, per unit of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Primary energy use, per unit of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Primary energy use, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2025)
- Coal production, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2024)
- Coal production, per unit of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP (2024)
- Fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2025)
- Fuel imports 20.4% (2020)
Frequently asked questions
- What is access to electricity, urban in Belarus?
- Access to electricity, urban in Belarus was 100.0% in 2024, according to SDG 7.1.1 Electrification Dataset, World Bank (WB).
- What is the highest access to electricity, urban recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 100.0% in 1990.
- What is the lowest access to electricity, urban recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 93.1% in 2000.
- How does Belarus rank for access to electricity, urban?
- Belarus ranks 1st out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is access to electricity, urban rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from SDG 7.1.1 Electrification Dataset, World Bank (WB), published as part of Access to electricity, urban (% of urban population). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Access to electricity, urban is the percentage of urban population with access to electricity.