Statizoid

Access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas in Lithuania

Lithuania: Access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas was 100.0% in 2024. ▬ Flat

Latest (2024)
100.0%
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 212 countries
All-time high
100.0%
in 1990
All-time low
99.1%
in 2000
Years of data
35
1990–2024

Access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas in Lithuania, 1990–2024

0204060801001990200720241990: 100 % of urban population1991: 100 % of urban population1992: 100 % of urban population1993: 100 % of urban population1994: 100 % of urban population1995: 100 % of urban population1996: 100 % of urban population1997: 100 % of urban population1998: 100 % of urban population1999: 100 % of urban population2000: 99.1 % of urban population2001: 99.1 % of urban population2002: 99.1 % of urban population2003: 99.1 % of urban population2004: 99.1 % of urban population2005: 99.1 % of urban population2006: 99.1 % of urban population2007: 99.2 % of urban population2008: 99.3 % of urban population2009: 99.4 % of urban population2010: 99.5 % of urban population2011: 99.7 % of urban population2012: 100 % of urban population2013: 100 % of urban population2014: 100 % of urban population2015: 100 % of urban population2016: 100 % of urban population2017: 100 % of urban population2018: 100 % of urban population2019: 100 % of urban population2020: 100 % of urban population2021: 100 % of urban population2022: 100 % of urban population2023: 100 % of urban population2024: 100 % of urban population

Source: SDG 7.1.1 Electrification Dataset, World Bank, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in % of urban population.

Analysis

In 2024, access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas in Lithuania stood at 100.0%. That is the highest value across all 35 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas in Lithuania peaked at 100.0% in 1990 and was at its lowest, 99.1%, in 2000.

Lithuania ranks 1st of 212 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 10
2000s 99.2% 99.1% 99.4% 10
2010s 99.9% 99.5% 100.0% 10
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 5

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 1 Albania 100.0% compare
  2. 1 Algeria 100.0% compare
  3. 1 Andorra 100.0% compare
  4. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 100.0% compare
  5. 1 Argentina 100.0% compare
  6. 1 Armenia 100.0% compare
  7. 1 Aruba 100.0% compare
  8. 1 Australia 100.0% compare
  9. 1 Austria 100.0% compare
  10. 1 Azerbaijan 100.0% compare
  11. 1 Bahamas 100.0% compare
  12. 1 Bahrain 100.0% compare
  13. 1 Barbados 100.0% compare
  14. 1 Belarus 100.0% compare
  15. 1 Belgium 100.0% compare
  16. 1 Bermuda 100.0% compare
  17. 1 Bhutan 100.0% compare
  18. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 100.0% compare
  19. 1 British Virgin Islands 100.0% compare
  20. 1 Brunei 100.0% compare
  21. 1 Bulgaria 100.0% compare
  22. 1 Cambodia 100.0% compare
  23. 1 Canada 100.0% compare
  24. 1 Cayman Islands 100.0% compare
  25. 1 Chile 100.0% compare
  26. 1 China 100.0% compare
  27. 1 Croatia 100.0% compare
  28. 1 Cuba 100.0% compare
  29. 1 Curacao 100.0% compare
  30. 1 Cyprus 100.0% compare
  31. 1 Czechia 100.0% compare
  32. 1 Denmark 100.0% compare
  33. 1 Dominica 100.0% compare
  34. 1 East Timor 100.0% compare
  35. 1 Ecuador 100.0% compare
  36. 1 Egypt 100.0% compare
  37. 1 Estonia 100.0% compare
  38. 1 Faroe Islands 100.0% compare
  39. 1 Finland 100.0% compare
  40. 1 France 100.0% compare
  41. 1 French Polynesia 100.0% compare
  42. 1 Georgia 100.0% compare
  43. 1 Germany 100.0% compare
  44. 1 Gibraltar 100.0% compare
  45. 1 Greece 100.0% compare
  46. 1 Greenland 100.0% compare
  47. 1 Guam 100.0% compare
  48. 1 Guyana 100.0% compare
  49. 1 Hong Kong 100.0% compare
  50. 1 Hungary 100.0% compare
  51. 1 Iceland 100.0% compare
  52. 1 India 100.0% compare
  53. 1 Indonesia 100.0% compare
  54. 1 Iran 100.0% compare
  55. 1 Iraq 100.0% compare
  56. 1 Isle of Man 100.0% compare
  57. 1 Israel 100.0% compare
  58. 1 Italy 100.0% compare
  59. 1 Japan 100.0% compare
  60. 1 Jordan 100.0% compare
  61. 1 Kazakhstan 100.0% compare
  62. 1 Kuwait 100.0% compare
  63. 1 Kyrgyzstan 100.0% compare
  64. 1 Laos 100.0% compare
  65. 1 Latvia 100.0% compare
  66. 1 Lebanon 100.0% compare
  67. 1 Libya 100.0% compare
  68. 1 Macao 100.0% compare
  69. 1 Malaysia 100.0% compare
  70. 1 Maldives 100.0% compare
  71. 1 Mauritius 100.0% compare
  72. 1 Moldova 100.0% compare
  73. 1 Monaco 100.0% compare
  74. 1 Montenegro 100.0% compare
  75. 1 Morocco 100.0% compare
  76. 1 Nauru 100.0% compare
  77. 1 Netherlands 100.0% compare
  78. 1 New Caledonia 100.0% compare
  79. 1 New Zealand 100.0% compare
  80. 1 Nicaragua 100.0% compare
  81. 1 North Macedonia 100.0% compare
  82. 1 Northern Mariana Islands 100.0% compare
  83. 1 Norway 100.0% compare
  84. 1 Oman 100.0% compare
  85. 1 Palau 100.0% compare
  86. 1 Palestine 100.0% compare
  87. 1 Poland 100.0% compare
  88. 1 Portugal 100.0% compare
  89. 1 Puerto Rico 100.0% compare
  90. 1 Qatar 100.0% compare
  91. 1 Romania 100.0% compare
  92. 1 Russia 100.0% compare
  93. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100.0% compare
  94. 1 Saint Lucia 100.0% compare
  95. 1 Saint Martin (French part) 100.0% compare
  96. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100.0% compare
  97. 1 Samoa 100.0% compare
  98. 1 San Marino 100.0% compare
  99. 1 Saudi Arabia 100.0% compare
  100. 1 Serbia 100.0% compare
  101. 1 Seychelles 100.0% compare
  102. 1 Singapore 100.0% compare
  103. 1 Sint Maarten (Dutch part) 100.0% compare
  104. 1 Slovakia 100.0% compare
  105. 1 Slovenia 100.0% compare
  106. 1 South Korea 100.0% compare
  107. 1 Spain 100.0% compare
  108. 1 Sri Lanka 100.0% compare
  109. 1 Suriname 100.0% compare
  110. 1 Sweden 100.0% compare
  111. 1 Switzerland 100.0% compare
  112. 1 Syria 100.0% compare
  113. 1 Thailand 100.0% compare
  114. 1 Tonga 100.0% compare
  115. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 100.0% compare
  116. 1 Tunisia 100.0% compare
  117. 1 Turkey 100.0% compare
  118. 1 Turkmenistan 100.0% compare
  119. 1 Turks and Caicos Islands 100.0% compare
  120. 1 Tuvalu 100.0% compare
  121. 1 Ukraine 100.0% compare
  122. 1 United Arab Emirates 100.0% compare
  123. 1 United Kingdom 100.0% compare
  124. 1 United States 100.0% compare
  125. 1 United States Virgin Islands 100.0% compare
  126. 1 Uruguay 100.0% compare
  127. 1 Uzbekistan 100.0% compare
  128. 1 Venezuela 100.0% compare
  129. 1 Vietnam 100.0% compare

See the full ranking of 212 places →

More energy & mining data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas in Lithuania?
Access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas in Lithuania was 100.0% in 2024, according to SDG 7.1.1 Electrification Dataset, World Bank, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 100.0% in 1990.
What is the lowest access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 99.1% in 2000.
How does Lithuania rank for access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas?
Lithuania ranks 1st out of 212 countries with data for 2024.
Is access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from SDG 7.1.1 Electrification Dataset, World Bank, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

About this data

Indicator
Access to electricity in urban vs. rural areas
Unit
% of urban population
Source
SDG 7.1.1 Electrification Dataset, World Bank, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
212 places, 6,652 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The definition used in international statistics adopts a very low cutoff for what it means to ‘have access to electricity’. It is defined as having an electricity source that can provide very basic lighting, and charge a phone or power a radio for 4 hours per day.