Annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate in Netherlands
Netherlands: Annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate was 207.79 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate in Netherlands, 1969–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Netherlands recorded 207.79 % change on previous year for annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate in 2025.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 247.7% on the previous year and up 305.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate in Netherlands peaked at 925 % change on previous year in 1969 and was at its lowest, -787.76 % change on previous year, in 2016.
That places Netherlands 4th out of 35 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate in Netherlands, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1969 | 925 % change on previous year | — |
| 1970 | -81.53 % change on previous year | -108.8% |
| 1971 | -30.19 % change on previous year | -63.0% |
| 1972 | -313.51 % change on previous year | +938.5% |
| 1974 | 177.37 % change on previous year | -156.6% |
| 1975 | -97.33 % change on previous year | -154.9% |
| 1976 | 825.86 % change on previous year | -948.6% |
| 1977 | -130.17 % change on previous year | -115.8% |
| 1978 | 316.05 % change on previous year | -342.8% |
| 1979 | -263.14 % change on previous year | -183.3% |
| 1980 | 224.52 % change on previous year | -185.3% |
| 1981 | -176.23 % change on previous year | -178.5% |
| 1982 | 144.1 % change on previous year | -181.8% |
| 1983 | -228.87 % change on previous year | -258.8% |
| 1984 | 139.61 % change on previous year | -161.0% |
| 1985 | 54.1 % change on previous year | -61.3% |
| 1986 | 68.62 % change on previous year | +26.8% |
| 1987 | -308.2 % change on previous year | -549.2% |
| 1988 | 118.03 % change on previous year | -138.3% |
| 1989 | 189.07 % change on previous year | +60.2% |
| 1990 | -250.29 % change on previous year | -232.4% |
| 1991 | 66.54 % change on previous year | -126.6% |
| 1992 | 372.25 % change on previous year | +459.5% |
| 1993 | -68.58 % change on previous year | -118.4% |
| 1994 | -87.16 % change on previous year | +27.1% |
| 1995 | 168.42 % change on previous year | -293.2% |
| 1996 | 178.43 % change on previous year | +5.9% |
| 1998 | 179.97 % change on previous year | +0.9% |
| 1999 | -98.64 % change on previous year | -154.8% |
| 2000 | 375.87 % change on previous year | -481.1% |
| 2001 | -41.36 % change on previous year | -111.0% |
| 2002 | -210.62 % change on previous year | +409.3% |
| 2003 | 276.94 % change on previous year | -231.5% |
| 2004 | -287.62 % change on previous year | -203.9% |
| 2005 | 189.52 % change on previous year | -165.9% |
| 2006 | -400.97 % change on previous year | -311.6% |
| 2007 | 238.42 % change on previous year | -159.5% |
| 2008 | -104.3 % change on previous year | -143.7% |
| 2009 | 352.81 % change on previous year | -438.3% |
| 2010 | -451.4 % change on previous year | -227.9% |
| 2011 | 161.47 % change on previous year | -135.8% |
| 2012 | -231.73 % change on previous year | -243.5% |
| 2013 | -352.9 % change on previous year | +52.3% |
| 2014 | 217.25 % change on previous year | -161.6% |
| 2015 | -101.11 % change on previous year | -146.5% |
| 2016 | -787.76 % change on previous year | +679.1% |
| 2017 | -373.66 % change on previous year | -52.6% |
| 2018 | 120.13 % change on previous year | -132.1% |
| 2019 | 251.74 % change on previous year | +109.6% |
| 2020 | -55.03 % change on previous year | -121.9% |
| 2021 | -246.05 % change on previous year | +347.1% |
| 2022 | 226.58 % change on previous year | -192.1% |
| 2023 | -152.08 % change on previous year | -167.1% |
| 2024 | -140.73 % change on previous year | -7.5% |
| 2025 | 207.79 % change on previous year | -247.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 925 % change on previous year | 925 % change on previous year | 925 % change on previous year | 1 |
| 1970s | 44.82 % change on previous year | -313.51 % change on previous year | 825.86 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | 22.47 % change on previous year | -308.2 % change on previous year | 224.52 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 51.22 % change on previous year | -250.29 % change on previous year | 372.25 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2000s | 38.87 % change on previous year | -400.97 % change on previous year | 375.87 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -154.8 % change on previous year | -787.76 % change on previous year | 251.74 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -26.59 % change on previous year | -246.05 % change on previous year | 226.58 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Netherlands
- 1 South Africa 831.35 % change on previous year compare
- 2 Czechia 431.93 % change on previous year compare
- 3 Russia 274.46 % change on previous year compare
- 5 USSR 190.84 % change on previous year compare
- 6 Romania 135.84 % change on previous year compare
- 7 China 113.14 % change on previous year compare
More energy & mining data for Netherlands
- Fuel imports 16.4% (2024)
- Ores and metals imports 2.6% (2024)
- Ores and metals exports 2.3% (2024)
- Gas production 77.69 terawatt-hours (2025)
- Fossil fuel production per person, by fuel 4,235 kilowatt-hours per person (2025)
- Fossil fuel production by fuel 77.69 terawatt-hours (2025)
- Gas production per person 4,235 kilowatt-hours per person (2025)
- Fossil fuel production by fuel, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2025)
- Fossil fuel production by fuel, per unit of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Gas production, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate in Netherlands?
- Annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate in Netherlands was 207.79 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate recorded in Netherlands?
- The highest recorded value was 925 % change on previous year in 1969.
- What is the lowest annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate recorded in Netherlands?
- The lowest recorded value was -787.76 % change on previous year in 2016.
- How does Netherlands rank for annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate?
- Netherlands ranks 4th out of 35 countries with data for 2025.
- Is annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate rising or falling in Netherlands?
- Over the last ten years it is up 305.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Netherlands data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Annual change in primary energy from nuclear, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 55 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Annual change in primary energy from nuclear Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual change in primary energy from nuclear. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.