Coal production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam
Viet Nam: Coal production, annual growth rate was 4.06 % change on previous year in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
4.06 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 155.9%
World rank
23rd
of 85 countries
All-time high
65.76 % change on previous year
in 1958
All-time low
-56.98 % change on previous year
in 1945
Years of data
125
1901–2025
Coal production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam, 1901–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2025, coal production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam stood at 4.06 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 155.9% on the previous year and up 188.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, coal production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam peaked at 65.76 % change on previous year in 1958 and was at its lowest, -56.98 % change on previous year, in 1945.
Viet Nam ranks 23rd of 85 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Coal production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1901 | -2.58 % change on previous year | — |
| 1902 | -20.64 % change on previous year | +700.7% |
| 1903 | 40 % change on previous year | -293.8% |
| 1904 | 43.81 % change on previous year | +9.5% |
| 1905 | -1.32 % change on previous year | -103.0% |
| 1906 | 5.7 % change on previous year | -530.7% |
| 1907 | 1.59 % change on previous year | -72.2% |
| 1908 | 8.44 % change on previous year | +431.5% |
| 1909 | 10.66 % change on previous year | +26.4% |
| 1910 | 29.95 % change on previous year | +180.9% |
| 1911 | -12.42 % change on previous year | -141.5% |
| 1912 | -1.6 % change on previous year | -87.1% |
| 1913 | 18.37 % change on previous year | -1246.9% |
| 1914 | 21.81 % change on previous year | +18.7% |
| 1915 | 3.71 % change on previous year | -83.0% |
| 1916 | 6.53 % change on previous year | +76.1% |
| 1917 | -4.53 % change on previous year | -169.3% |
| 1918 | -2.6 % change on previous year | -42.6% |
| 1919 | 4.4 % change on previous year | -269.1% |
| 1920 | 5.26 % change on previous year | +19.7% |
| 1921 | 31.57 % change on previous year | +499.8% |
| 1922 | 7.49 % change on previous year | -76.3% |
| 1923 | 6.77 % change on previous year | -9.7% |
| 1924 | 16.93 % change on previous year | +150.2% |
| 1925 | 10.28 % change on previous year | -39.3% |
| 1926 | -5.36 % change on previous year | -152.1% |
| 1927 | 15.58 % change on previous year | -390.9% |
| 1928 | 31.86 % change on previous year | +104.5% |
| 1929 | 0.3055 % change on previous year | -99.0% |
| 1930 | -0.8621 % change on previous year | -382.2% |
| 1931 | -11.71 % change on previous year | +1258.8% |
| 1932 | -0.7537 % change on previous year | -93.6% |
| 1933 | -7.12 % change on previous year | +845.0% |
| 1934 | 0.0633 % change on previous year | -100.9% |
| 1935 | 11.49 % change on previous year | +18056.8% |
| 1936 | 23.15 % change on previous year | +101.4% |
| 1937 | 5.58 % change on previous year | -75.9% |
| 1938 | 1.6 % change on previous year | -71.3% |
| 1939 | 11.51 % change on previous year | +618.3% |
| 1940 | -4.4 % change on previous year | -138.2% |
| 1941 | -6.84 % change on previous year | +55.5% |
| 1942 | -46.63 % change on previous year | +581.7% |
| 1943 | -17.94 % change on previous year | -61.5% |
| 1944 | -47.35 % change on previous year | +163.9% |
| 1945 | -56.98 % change on previous year | +20.3% |
| 1946 | 13.42 % change on previous year | -123.6% |
| 1947 | -0.7633 % change on previous year | -105.7% |
| 1948 | 38.08 % change on previous year | -5088.7% |
| 1949 | 5.01 % change on previous year | -86.8% |
| 1950 | 33.42 % change on previous year | +566.6% |
| 1951 | 27.04 % change on previous year | -19.1% |
| 1952 | 40.06 % change on previous year | +48.2% |
| 1953 | -0.8939 % change on previous year | -102.2% |
| 1954 | 11.27 % change on previous year | -1361.2% |
| 1955 | 11.45 % change on previous year | +1.6% |
| 1956 | 10.64 % change on previous year | -7.1% |
| 1957 | -9.78 % change on previous year | -191.9% |
| 1958 | 65.76 % change on previous year | -772.5% |
| 1959 | 22.09 % change on previous year | -66.4% |
| 1960 | 17.69 % change on previous year | -19.9% |
| 1961 | 9.22 % change on previous year | -47.9% |
| 1962 | 23.81 % change on previous year | +158.3% |
| 1963 | -3.34 % change on previous year | -114.0% |
| 1964 | 2.52 % change on previous year | -175.4% |
| 1965 | 2.08 % change on previous year | -17.2% |
| 1966 | -2.15 % change on previous year | -203.3% |
| 1967 | -20 % change on previous year | +829.0% |
| 1968 | 7.14 % change on previous year | -135.7% |
| 1969 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1970 | -0.3333 % change on previous year | — |
| 1971 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1972 | -33.11 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | 49.5 % change on previous year | -249.5% |
| 1974 | 33.78 % change on previous year | -31.8% |
| 1975 | 30 % change on previous year | -11.2% |
| 1976 | 7.69 % change on previous year | -74.4% |
| 1977 | 10.71 % change on previous year | +39.3% |
| 1978 | -3.23 % change on previous year | -130.1% |
| 1979 | -8.33 % change on previous year | +158.3% |
| 1980 | -10.43 % change on previous year | +25.2% |
| 1981 | -2.56 % change on previous year | -75.4% |
| 1982 | 5 % change on previous year | -295.0% |
| 1983 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1984 | -20.63 % change on previous year | — |
| 1985 | 12 % change on previous year | -158.2% |
| 1986 | 8.93 % change on previous year | -25.6% |
| 1987 | 3.28 % change on previous year | -63.3% |
| 1988 | -3.17 % change on previous year | -196.8% |
| 1989 | -16.39 % change on previous year | +416.4% |
| 1990 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1991 | 1.96 % change on previous year | — |
| 1992 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1993 | 25 % change on previous year | — |
| 1994 | -7.08 % change on previous year | -128.3% |
| 1995 | 38.24 % change on previous year | -640.4% |
| 1996 | 17.64 % change on previous year | -53.9% |
| 1997 | 15.93 % change on previous year | -9.7% |
| 1998 | 2.49 % change on previous year | -84.3% |
| 1999 | -17.5 % change on previous year | -801.8% |
| 2000 | 20.56 % change on previous year | -217.5% |
| 2001 | 15.4 % change on previous year | -25.1% |
| 2002 | 22.48 % change on previous year | +46.0% |
| 2003 | 17.7 % change on previous year | -21.3% |
| 2004 | 41.6 % change on previous year | +135.0% |
| 2005 | 24.66 % change on previous year | -40.7% |
| 2006 | 13.74 % change on previous year | -44.3% |
| 2007 | 9.55 % change on previous year | -30.5% |
| 2008 | -6.37 % change on previous year | -166.7% |
| 2009 | 10.81 % change on previous year | -269.8% |
| 2010 | 1.72 % change on previous year | -84.1% |
| 2011 | 3.96 % change on previous year | +130.7% |
| 2012 | -9.71 % change on previous year | -345.2% |
| 2013 | -2.42 % change on previous year | -75.1% |
| 2014 | 0.0538 % change on previous year | -102.2% |
| 2015 | 1.41 % change on previous year | +2512.5% |
| 2016 | -7.03 % change on previous year | -599.8% |
| 2017 | -0.8415 % change on previous year | -88.0% |
| 2018 | 10.35 % change on previous year | -1329.8% |
| 2019 | 9.44 % change on previous year | -8.7% |
| 2020 | -3.86 % change on previous year | -140.8% |
| 2021 | 8.34 % change on previous year | -316.2% |
| 2022 | 3.19 % change on previous year | -61.8% |
| 2023 | -5.21 % change on previous year | -263.5% |
| 2024 | -7.26 % change on previous year | +39.4% |
| 2025 | 4.06 % change on previous year | -155.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 9.52 % change on previous year | -20.64 % change on previous year | 43.81 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1910s | 6.36 % change on previous year | -12.42 % change on previous year | 29.95 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 12.07 % change on previous year | -5.36 % change on previous year | 31.86 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 3.3 % change on previous year | -11.71 % change on previous year | 23.15 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | -12.44 % change on previous year | -56.98 % change on previous year | 38.08 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 21.11 % change on previous year | -9.78 % change on previous year | 65.76 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 3.7 % change on previous year | -20 % change on previous year | 23.81 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 8.67 % change on previous year | -33.11 % change on previous year | 49.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -2.4 % change on previous year | -20.63 % change on previous year | 12 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.67 % change on previous year | -17.5 % change on previous year | 38.24 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 17.02 % change on previous year | -6.37 % change on previous year | 41.6 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.6925 % change on previous year | -9.71 % change on previous year | 10.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.1237 % change on previous year | -7.26 % change on previous year | 8.34 % change on previous year | 6 |
Countries ranked near Viet Nam
- 20 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 4.91 % change on previous year compare
- 21 New Zealand 4.16 % change on previous year compare
- 22 United States of America 4.13 % change on previous year compare
- 24 Philippines 3.34 % change on previous year compare
- 25 Czechia 1.67 % change on previous year compare
- 26 China 1.46 % change on previous year compare
More energy & mining data for Viet Nam
- Fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per unit of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Primary energy use, annual growth rate 3.71 % change on previous year (2025)
- Coal consumption, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2025)
- Coal consumption, per unit of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Primary energy use, per unit of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Primary energy use, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2025)
- Coal production, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2025)
- Coal production, per unit of GDP 0 terawatt-hours per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Fossil fuel consumption by fuel, per capita 0 terawatt-hours per person (2025)
- Fuel imports 7.9% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is coal production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam?
- Coal production, annual growth rate in Viet Nam was 4.06 % change on previous year in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest coal production, annual growth rate recorded in Viet Nam?
- The highest recorded value was 65.76 % change on previous year in 1958.
- What is the lowest coal production, annual growth rate recorded in Viet Nam?
- The lowest recorded value was -56.98 % change on previous year in 1945.
- How does Viet Nam rank for coal production, annual growth rate?
- Viet Nam ranks 23rd out of 85 countries with data for 2025.
- Is coal production, annual growth rate rising or falling in Viet Nam?
- Over the last ten years it is up 188.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Coal production, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 125 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Coal production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Coal production Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Coal production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.